I have used photographs of people demographically similar to the target audience I am targeting- giving them people they can relate to. Demographically I am aiming at 16-25year olds of any race and a family social status of C1, C2, and B (usually classed as a ‘mid market’ family.) This was to provide a balance in income and expenditure. Mainly males will buy the magazine. However, some women are featured and I have interviewed bands of both genders as well. This could be a reason why females will also want to buy my magazine. Psychographically, mainstreamers, individuals and aspirers are who I aim my magazine at with regards to its advertising. To appeal to my readers psychographically I also consciously review the unsigned or newly signed bands which cause aspirers to realise the potential of their own dreams and the extent to which they can come true with the help of ‘Signature Rock Magazine’. The gadget reviews show the individual reliance on music is widespread- it also links to the sub cultural identities of Emos, Punks, and Goths etc. who are usually seen as resistant of the dominant culture through their own choice of style with clothes- as a way of expressing individuality.

Although, unintentional, by not using photographs of every race because of the area we live in it was much harder to find a range of diverse races into ‘Rock’ music, I could be excluding some readers. I haven’t made too many assumptions with band names that link to any one gender or style of music. I have used colour surrounding the names of the bands in stereotyped gender strokes such as, blue, black and purple. With regards to stereotyping with my photographs I used a boy for my cover image in a screaming (the lyrics) facial expression to suggest the masculine stereotyped characteristics of control, domination, aggression and the fact it is not a group photo shows his independence as well. However, I have tried to subvert the female stereotypes by using the photo of ‘Mia Renee’ on the contents page in a plain, indie style hat compared to an overtly ‘emo’ style showing black skinny jeans, bright luminous tops and studded accessories. However, I did keep the feminine characteristics of shyness within the photos because in both photos of the two girls neither is directly addressing the camera. That was a conscious decision I made to contrast with the over-stereotyped gothic cover image which appears more confident and therefore grabs our attention. In several of the photos the youths are looking straight at the camera, this connates how the youths today are more out going and rebelious than stereotypical youths in the past. The subjects are wearing a range of clothing that students would wear, some clothes fit into a stereotypical teenage image of 'goth' clothes (black, spikes, rock), and 'emo' clothes (colourful, skinny jeans, black hair). I reinforced some stereotypes of teenage styles of like goth and emo, but other photos show that not all teens are the same and can have their own style and not fit into a stereotype. I photographed the free poster image for the contents in a very simplistic way, this became the background to the contents and another image was desaturated to create a black and white image. I have implied that young people are into gadgets and new technologies, new bands and exciting interviews and gossip. I personally think I have undermined the stereotype of youth because I have shown instead of being obsessed with fame the majority of my target audience are more interested in newer, local, down to earth bands.